reasoning+in+a+circle
31Hermeneutic circle — Contents 1 Definition and usage 2 Critique 3 Notes 4 References Definition and usage The hermeneutic circle describes the proce …
32Crop Circle — Agroglyphe Un agroglyphe (ici de type “fractale”). Un agroglyphe, parfois nommé cercle de culture ou cercle de récolte, est un motif réalisé dans un champ de blé ou d autres céréales par flexion des épis afin de représenter diverses formes… …
33Crop circle — Agroglyphe Un agroglyphe (ici de type “fractale”). Un agroglyphe, parfois nommé cercle de culture ou cercle de récolte, est un motif réalisé dans un champ de blé ou d autres céréales par flexion des épis afin de représenter diverses formes… …
34Native Writers' Circle of the Americas — The Native Writers Circle of the Americas (NWCA) is an organization of Native American writers, most notable for its literary awards, presented annually to Native American writers in three categories: First Book of Poetry, First Book of Prose,… …
35Refraction circle — Refraction Re*frac tion (r?*fr?k sh?n), n. [F. r[ e]fraction.] 1. The act of refracting, or the state of being refracted. [1913 Webster] 2. The change in the direction of ray of light, heat, or the like, when it enters obliquely a medium of a… …
36Cartesian circle — The Cartesian circle is a mistake in reasoning attributed to René Descartes.Descartes argues ndash; for example, in the third of his Meditations on First Philosophy ndash; that whatever one clearly and distinctly perceives is true: I now seem to… …
37Cartesian circle — Allegedly circular reasoning used by René Descartes to show that whatever he perceives clearly and distinctly is true. Descartes argues that clear and distinct perception is a guarantor of truth because God, who is not a deceiver, would not allow …
38Cartesian circle — noun A supposed error in reasoning attributed to René Descartes. A form of circular argument …
39circular reasoning/definition — See circle, vicious …
40VICIOUS CIRCLE — the logical FALLACY which involves supporting an argument by circular reasoning where the conclusion has already been used to support a premise upon which the conclusion is based. Generally it means using a statement to support a second… …
