inclusio unius est exclusio alterius

inclusio unius est exclusio alterius
a rule of interpretation that states that 'including one excludes another'. The statement 'no dogs allowed' under this rule would mean that panthers were allowed.

Collins dictionary of law. . 2001.

Игры ⚽ Поможем решить контрольную работу

Look at other dictionaries:

  • inclusio unius est exclusio alterius — /inkluwzh(iy)ow yanayas est akskluwzh(iy)ow oltarayas/ The inclusion of one is the exclusion of another. The certain designation of one person is an absolute exclusion of all others. Burgin v. Forbes, 293 Ky. 456, 169 S.W.2d 321, 325. This… …   Black's law dictionary

  • inclusio unius est exclusio alterius — /inkluwzh(iy)ow yanayas est akskluwzh(iy)ow oltarayas/ The inclusion of one is the exclusion of another. The certain designation of one person is an absolute exclusion of all others. Burgin v. Forbes, 293 Ky. 456, 169 S.W.2d 321, 325. This… …   Black's law dictionary

  • Inclusio unius est exclusio alterius — The inclusion of one is the exclusion of the other. Ex parte Cox, 44 Fla 537, 33 So 509 …   Ballentine's law dictionary

  • exclusion — ex·clu·sion /ik sklü zhən/ n 1: the act of excluding or state of being excluded; specif: refusal of entry into the U.S. by immigration officials review of deportation and exclusion orders compare deportation 2: something that excludes or is… …   Law dictionary

  • conclusion — con·clu·sion /kən klü zhən/ n 1: a judgment or opinion inferred from relevant facts our conclusion upon the present evidence Missouri v. Illinois, 200 U.S. 496 (1905) 2 a: a final summarizing (as of a closing argument) b: the last or closing part …   Law dictionary

  • include — I verb absorb, adscribere, be composed of, be formed of, be made up of, begird, boast, bound, bracket, circumscribe, classify, close in, combine, compass, complecti, comprehend, comprehendere, consist of, consolidate, contain, cover, embody,… …   Law dictionary

  • Fisher v. Bell — English case infobox name=Fisher v. Bell court=High Court, Queen s Bench Division date decided=10 November 1960 full name=Fisher v. Bell citations= [1961] 1 Q.B. 394; [1960] 3 All E.R. 731 judges=Lord Parker C.J., Ashworth and Elwes, JJ. Cases… …   Wikipedia

Share the article and excerpts

Direct link
Do a right-click on the link above
and select “Copy Link”